Saturday 12 January 2013

In Defense of Skipper (Both Sides of the Pond: Cat on a Hot Tin Roof)

Note: page numbers are from the Dramatists Play Service Inc. version of the play.

            The role of Skipper in any given production of Tennessee Williams’s Cat on a Hot Tin Roof is an interesting one.  Though not actually present as an actor on the list of characters at the beginning of the play itself, the dramatic arc of the play would not exist without him.   It is his relationship with Brick that creates the central tension between Brick and the other members of the Pollitt family.  The production currently running on Broadway made a very interesting choice regarding Skipper’s presence: they gave him one.  They have since changed their minds, removing his presence, but this unique choice added an interesting, new dimension.  Having seen it twice, once with Skipper and once without, I think that while the show does not lack anything without him his presence adds to the experience in an interesting way.
            The audience is first shown Skipper in Act One when Margaret (Maggie) starts talking about him at length: “I made my mistake when I told you the truth about that thing with Skipper” (25).  Maggie has been hinting at some incident in the past with this dear friend of her husband Brick and the conversation finally explodes in this scene.  In this instance, the director had the actor playing Skipper, dressed in a letter jacket evocative of his football playing days at Old Miss, walk along the gallery outside of the bedroom looking in.  Maggie has conjured him, but he is not welcome yet.  The truth is not fully out.  Brick has also not welcomed the specter of his dead best friend yet.  Brick still resists having the conversation, saying “I had friendship with Skipper.  You are namin’ it dirty!” (27).  The fact that his wife brought it up makes the discussion tainted somehow.  He blames Maggie for Skipper’s death because she was the one who told Skipper to stop loving her husband.  So the ghost warily walks the gallery, looking in on the marital strife.  With this visual manifestation of Skipper, this scene evokes what the relationship must have been like for Maggie; she was always the proverbial third wheel.  Without his presence, the scene is much more focused on the fight between bereaved husband and ignored wife.  The distinction is an important one.  It asks whether this scene about Brick’s relationship with Maggie or with Skipper.  Classically, this scene is written as though it is about Brick’s relationship to Maggie.  It is in this scene that the conditions of the continuation of their marriage are revealed.  This makes the purpose of the scene to reveal more about this relationship.  But Brick’s relationship to Skipper has always figured into his relationship to Maggie, so Skipper’s presence manifests the unspoken truth of the conversation: Brick’s relationship to Maggie was never quite as valuable to him as his relationship to Skipper.
            Skipper’s second and final appearance happens during Brick’s big talk with Big Daddy. Big Daddy forces Brick to defend his drinking, in many ways forcing Brick to confront his role in Skipper’s death.  This allows Skipper into the room.  He enters from the gallery and explores the edges of the bedroom as Brick tells the story of their relationship.  Brick insists that the relationship was “a pure an’ true thing” (57) while dispelling the rumor that Skipper and he were more than friends.  With his presence in the scene, Brick’s story has an air of speciousness.  With Skipper’s presence, the scene is imbued with an added degree of tragedy; the audience can see the look on his face when Brick denies that their relationship was anything more than friendship and it is a look of sadness.  When Brick begins to talk about the phone call Skipper placed in which the audience is meant to understand that Skipper confessed his love, Skipper picks up the phone.  The ghostly ring of the phone is more fully separated from the present.  Without Skipper present, it’s not totally clear that the phone is not ringing; the tonal quality of the ring is slightly different and the phone itself is hidden in purple shadows while the main action is tightly confined to the glow of center stage, but Skipper’s presence removes the phone call in a much more definitive way. 
Skipper is Brick’s demon; he is the reason Brick drinks.  His physical presence in the show adds an interesting representation of the burden Brick bears.  We see the play more from Brick’s perspective with Skipper’s presence.  Without Skipper, the other relationships Brick has are more highlighted.  The production does not suffer without Skipper.  The ensemble is very strong and very cohesive.  But the dimensions that his presence brings out make the show very different.  Both are good; one is more unique.